Skip Nav

Marijuana Should Be Legalized

Annotated Bibliography on Legalizing Medical Marijuana

❶This article will be very useful in analyzing marijuana from a pharmacological point of view. This research article will prove useful in providing another medical perspective in the positive and adverse effects of medical marijuana, despite its individual and societal benefits.

Negative Uses of Medical Marijuana

Essay title: Legalization of Marijuana
How to cite this page
Term paper resources

If so, then should there be under certain conditions, or if not, why? Arizona's Proposition would create a medical marijuana registry using a card system with a state system to distribute the drug to eligible individuals. Again, in Nevada, Ballot Question 5 would amend the state constitution to decriminalize possession for marijuana quantities amounting to three ounces or less, by a person 21 or older Daily Reports, Washington States' Medical Use of Marijuana Act would allow the medical use of marijuana for debilitating or terminal conditions.

Legalizing the medically supervised use of marijuana is humane, just, and ethical; whereas, maintaining the current criminal status for someone in pain is not.

However, opponents say, do not weaken drug laws for the sake of medicine because marijuana supporters do not mention is that statements like this are built on a limited foundation. Only a few studies have investigated the medicinal benefits of marijuana, and even fewer have examined the effects of long-term marijuana use Daily Reports, Nevada organizers for Ballet Question 5 hope voters in a state where almost anything goes will legalize marijuana and will be the first state allowing adults to possess bought from government-regulated marijuana shops.

However, opponents including law enforcement, nation's drug czar, civic, and business groups, argue the measure would encourage the use of other drugs. Also, questioning whether legalizing marijuana will even prove to be a good source of tax revenue MSNBC, In November, city voters elected Perry Bullard to the Michigan House of Representatives on a platform calling for full legalization of marijuana possession but not for adults throughout the state to sale. However, opponents feel the last 30 years, the college town of Ann Arbor; Michigan has enacted some of the most lenient laws on marijuana possession in the United States.

These include measures approved in a city council ordinance, a voter referendum making possession of small amounts of the substance merely a civil infraction subject to a small fine, and a referendum on the use of medical marijuana Wikipedia, n. A bill legalizing marijuana in Vermont had Senate approval and it looks as though it will become a law without the governor signing. The governor said, "I will not oppose this decision of the elected representatives of the people, nor will I support it by signing it into law.

I cannot actively support a measure that allows Vermonters to be subject to prosecution under federal law, increases controlled substance availability, and sends a dangerous message to our children. However, the opposing White House argued for Governor Douglas to veto the bill and lobbied in the state against it. Even though under this legislation provides patients suffering from AIDS, cancer, or multiple sclerosis to grow up to three marijuana plants in a locked room and possess two ounces of usable marijuana.

The second body of testimony to testify at this congressional hearing were industrial spokesmen. The first of these spokesmen was, believe it or not, a man representing the rope industry. This industry representative testified that it was cheaper to import from the Far East the hemp needed to make ropes and therefore the United States no longer needed to grow any more hemp to make rope. Interestingly, five years later, in , the United States was cut off from its sources of hemp in the Far East and, since we needed a lot of hemp to outfit our ships with rope for World War II, the Federal Government went into the business of growing hemp on gigantic farms throughout the Midwest and the South.

The only industrial spokesperson who objected to the Marihuana Tax Act at all was the birdseed representative who sung the praises of hemp seeds for the birds coats. Based on this objection the birdseed industry got an exemption from the Marihuana Tax Act for "denatured seeds.

The third body of testimony were two representatives of the medical field. The first testimony came from a pharmacologist who claimed that he had injected the active ingredient in marihuana into the brains of dogs, two of which died. When asked by the Congressmen if he choose dogs for the similarity of their reactions to that of humans the answer of the pharmacologist was, "I wouldn't know, I am not a dog psychologist. The second testimony on behalf of the medical field came from the Chief Counsel to the American Medical Association, Dr.

Woodward was the hearing to testify at the request of the American Medical Association. His exact quote to the congressmen was, "The American Medical Association knows of no evidence that marihuana is a dangerous drug.

The act did not itself criminalize the possession or usage of marijuana but instead levied a tax of approximately one dollar on anyone who dealt commercially in marijuana. The intended result and indeed, the result of the Marihuana Tax Act was to effectively make it too risky for anyone to deal in the substance.

During the war years the Bureau chose to concentrate on opiates and abandoned responsibility for most marijuana law enforcement to the states. In the post-war years, however, there was found to be a significant increase in narcotic drug abuse and the public began to be concerned with the spread of narcotic addiction, particularly among young persons.

Congressional furor was aroused by the assertion that the use of marihuana inevitably led to the use of these harder drugs, particularly heroin. It was at this time, for the first time in federal drug legislation, that marijuana and the narcotic drugs were lumped together, since the Act provided uniform penalties for the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act Boggs Act, ibid. The states followed the federal lead. Then, in , Congress passed the Narcotic Control Act, escalating the penalties still further.

Once again the individual states followed suit. The current Controlled Substances Act CSA , Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of is a consolidation of numerous previous laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, anabolic steroids, and chemicals used in the illicit production of controlled substances.

The CSA places all substances that are regulated under existing federal law into one of five schedules. This placement is based upon the substance's medicinal value, harmfulness, and potential for abuse or addiction.

Schedule I is reserved for the most dangerous drugs that have no recognized medical use, and, of course, is the current classification of marijuana. Just one year's savings would cover the full cost of anti-terrorism port security measures required by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of A further comprehensive study which reports and analyzes national arrest data between and is, "Crimes of Indiscretion: This report includes a detailed examination of the fiscal costs associated with the enforcement of marijuana laws at the state and county level.

FN22 The findings include but are not limited to the following: However, these increased arrest rates have not been associated with a reduction in marijuana use, reduced marijuana availability, a reduction in the number of new marijuana users, reduced treatment admissions, reduced emergency room mentions of marijuana, any reduction in marijuana potency, or any increases in the price of marijuana.

Decriminalization saves a tremendous amount in enforcement costs. Any discussion of marijuana should begin with the fact that there have been numerous official reports and studies, every one of which has concluded that marijuana poses no great risk to society and should not be criminalized.

There are many conflicting views on how marijuana affects the mind and body. That in itself speaks volumes. It is also interesting to note that, to the best of anyone's knowledge, not one person has ever died from a marijuana overdose.

That most definitely cannot be said of alcohol. The La Guardia Report is a treasure trove of information regarding the affects of marijuana on a person sociologically, medically, psychologically and pharmacologically.

LaGuardia appointed a special committee to make a thorough sociological and scientific investigation upon the advice of The New York Academy of Medicine. This study is viewed by many experts as the best study of any drug viewed in its social, medical, and legal context. The committee covered thousands of years of the history of marijuana.

In , a Congressionally created commission called the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, whose members were appointed by then-President Richard Nixon, completed one of the most comprehensive reviews ever undertaken regarding marijuana and public policy.

A Signal of Misunderstanding," proclaimed that "from what is now known about the effects of marihuana, its use at the present level does not constitute a major threat to public health," and recommended Congress and state legislatures decriminalize the use and casual distribution of marijuana for personal use. Another important study was conducted by Dr. Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.

This recent study, the largest of its kind, unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer. Tashkin indicated that the findings "were against our expectations We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect.

Although I could go on and on quoting different studies done by well-respected doctors, government appointed committees, etc. In any which way, the effects most definitely do not warrant total prohibition. California's Proposition was the first statewide medical marijuana voter initiative adopted in the USA. A To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.

B To ensure that patients and their primary care givers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction. C To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana. Further, Senate Bill which passed on September 20, , was signed by the Governor on October 13, , and which became effective on January 1, , added an Article 2.

Among other things, Article 2. Public opinion on the medical value of marijuana has been sharply divided. Some dismiss medical marijuana as a hoax that exploits our natural compassion for the sick; others claim it is a uniquely soothing medicine that has been withheld from patients through regulations based on false claims.

Proponents of both views cite "scientific evidence" to support their views and have expressed those views at the ballot box in recent state elections. This study was supported under Contract No. This report summarizes and analyzes what is known about the medical use of marijuana; it emphasizes evidence-based medicine derived from knowledge and experience informed by rigorous scientific analysis , as opposed to belief-based medicine derived from judgment, intuition, and beliefs untested by rigorous science.

After their nearly two-year review, the investigators affirmed: Except for the harms associated with smoking, the adverse effects of marijuana use are within the range tolerated for other medications. So many people who are ill must resort to using marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Many of these people have never used marijuana previously, thereby quelling the theory that the use of marijuana for illness is just an "excuse" to smoke pot.

The list of diseases which cannabis can be used for includes but is not limited to: There are over 60 chemicals in marijuana which may have medical uses. It is relatively easy to extract these into food or beverage, or into some sort of lotion, using butter, fat, oil, or alcohol. One chemical, cannabinol, may be useful to help people who cannot sleep.

Another is taken from premature buds and is called cannabidiolic acid. It is a powerful disinfectant. Marijuana dissolved in rubbing alcohol helps people with the skin disease herpes control their sores, and a salve like this was one of the earliest medical uses for cannabis.

The leaves were once used in bandages and a relaxing non-psychoactive herbal tea can be made from small cannabis stems. As stated before, marijuana is classified by the federal government as a Schedule I drug, a reservation for the most dangerous drugs that have no recognized medical use.

Although many states have legalized medical marijuana, possession, use and cultivation is still illegal on the federal level. There have been past attempts to reclassify marijuana. The government declined to initiate proceedings on the basis of their interpretation of U.

The Court ruled against the government and ordered them to process the petition. After continuing to rely on treaty commitments in their interpretation of scheduling related issues concerning the petition a Court decision made it clear that the CSA requires a full scientific and medical evaluation and the fulfillment of the rescheduling process before treaty commitments can be evaluated.

In , Francis L. In his recommendation he stated,. To conclude otherwise, on this record, would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious. The second petition was filed by Jon Gettman in

Popular guides

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

In this paper I will discuss the history of marijuana, the industrial uses of hemp, the prohibition of marijuana, the economical impact prohibition has on America, the effects of marijuana use on the mind and the body, marijuana for medical use, and how legalization of marijuana would have a positive influence on America.

Privacy FAQs

Free marijuana papers, essays, and research papers. The Legalization of Marijuana - Medical marijuana is one of the most controversial subjects in politics.

About Our Ads

Research Paper Marijuana Legalization Words | 10 Pages Abstract Marijuana is the people’s drug of choice; it’s the most popular drug of all the drugs. Medical Marijuana Legalization The debate over whether marijuana should be legalized has long troubled many American citizens. There are many political aspects that have to be taken into account when making a big federal decision such as this.

Cookie Info

A research paper sample on legalize; Writing a research project introduction Legalization of marijuana will assist in eliminating these traffickers and create a good business opportunity for licensed suppliers. Consequently, marijuana should be legalized in order to uphold the integrity to humanity through promoting autonomy to the decision. Marijuana legalization for medicinal purposes is a highly controversial subject that is sure to heighten the interest of many. This topic has been on the horizon for many years and in the recent past that has brought various governing bodies to debate. We will write a custom essay sample on Legalizing Marijuana Research Paper specifically.