I don't have much to say on the dialogue, though most of the characters have a unique way of speaking. I'd say you're unlikely to confuse Ron's lines with Dumbledore's. There are also a few verbal tics Hagrid's pronunciation, Tonks saying 'wotcher' that add a bit of character to them.
Most of the dialogue from students is quite casual and what you'd imagine students to use barring swearing. I would say the sentence structure in the first books is simpler. They clearly read more like children's books, which is fine. That being said, while I love Harry Potter, I sometimes don't love the writing style as much.
I'm not that bothered by the many adverbs, but it annoys me that any time something significant happens she starts a sentence with "And then It annoys me most when it happens several times on the same page. In a few instances she uses not too common words twice within one sentence. She also excessively uses "large" and "enormous". It makes most conversations feel very authentic. She's also a great world builder when it comes to small details, underlying themes, and recurring symbolism.
She does a great job of blending the world of "reality" with the world of "magic" so that she can play with things like no one knowing if the Deathly hallows are mythical or real, neither characters or us readers.
In the early books I felt she lacked a lot of pacing and tended to either describe every second of an event, or casually write "three weeks passed quickly after that" and just plop us into the next upcoming situation of interest. I also felt like she wasn't so great at actually describing the world - it was either a bit dry and whimsical or just quite fragmented, jumping from detail to detail without painting a bigger picture.
I really feel like she improved this for the latter books though. By the time of book 5, I think she had reached kind of her ultimate writing style and that's also the first book I was completely immersed in without even a small thought about how it was written. That's usually a good sign! In some ways I feel like the way Harry grew as a character, JK grew as a writer with each book. She went from fascinating and interesting in the first books to absolutely captivating in the last three.
Hopefully one day my children study it as a Literature text. We'll be able to help with the homework: I feel her writing is purely expositional, but in a creative way.
Some, I suspect, want to see the theories disproved. Others simply want to see it exposed, lifted from the pages to becomes an example we can learn from. So here you go. The author even cites page numbers of the major story milestones, with rationale showing how these story turns fulfill the mission of each. No surprise to me, at least , it worked. Somewhere out there, a guy named Cervantes is rolling over in his grave. Filed under Six Core Competencies.
This is just another example of how powerful the paradigm is. It certainly helped me make sense of all the amorphous ideas floating around in my head, and may have even helped me snag my agent. Keep up the good work. It keeps things fresh and intriguing. Rarely do I find trilogies that are equally great or get better with each book. The Hunger Games works. The Divergent series so far has not let me down with two great books so far.
The first two books of the Uglies series were great. You get the point. But, dare I admit that I owe her a huge debt? Luckily, JK Rowling published some of her outlines. Bang, the light went on! She had a great format for handling multiple viewpoints, overlapping storylines, and a bigger story.
So, I may not like her books, but that is a matter of taste. I respect her as a writer. I may also have issues because of my Physics background: Where did the extra mass come from in this spell?
I made this outline, edited the heck out of it several times, and created a novel that is far better than anything I ever wrote before. The moral of this story: Good story is the same, no matter the genre or topic.
As I noted, this opened my eyes in a big way and made my much better new book possible. Her format is simple, but very flexible. Any links would be appreciated. Thanks for the deconstruction info, Larry. Thanks to Larry and everyone else for checking out my blog, Write Like Rowling. Your comments were insightful, encouraging, and much appreciated. In the meantime, though — Olga, Robert, and Sandra — I will try to track it down on my own and get it posted.
Apr 28, · Individuals who are not literary critics are unlikely to analyze writing style. All of that to describe why the following sentence doesn’t have a lot of meat (Rowling uses transparent prose and I am not a literary critic): JK Rowling’s writing is whimsical and rhythmic, with lots of irony and good flow.
Sep 26, · So what makes J.K. Rowling style of writing so good that her books are loved by people of many different nations and any age? Persistence Thomas Edison /5().
the writing style of J. K. Rowling in her Harry Potter in terms of sentence structure, tense of the verb, and voice of the verb; and examine the deep structure writing style of J. K. Rowling in her Harry Potter in terms of number of kernel sentences in transformed sentences, connectives used. Discussion/Theory What's J.K. Rowling's style of writing? (goodfilemq.cfotter) submitted 1 year ago I think she had reached kind of her ultimate writing style and that's also the first book I was completely immersed in without even a small thought about how it was written. In some ways I feel like the way Harry grew as a character, JK.
J. K. Rowling Writing Styles in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone J. K. Rowling This Study Guide consists of approximately 51 pages of chapter summaries, quotes, character analysis, themes, and more - everything you need to sharpen your knowledge of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. J.K. Rowling writing style 10 things J.K. Rowling taught me about writing As the Harry Potter author’s first novel for adults, The Casual Vacancy, debuts today, it’s a good time to revisit what writers can learn from her writing style.