We do not know yet. We only know that it is evening and that they are walking through streets of a sordid section of a certain city. We do not know its name but it seems representative of other great cities of modern western civilization. Then the speaker mentions a question, an overwhelming question, but he does not want to talk about it. And since the question is never asked in the poem, the answer is never given.
We also learn that they are going to pay a visit to a place in which women talk of Michelangelo. After thinking of the women to be visited, the speaker returns to a vision of the streets, the fog, beautifully described as a cat that falls asleep.
It seems that Prufrock is putting to sleep the vision he had of the city and also he is gaining time from the society that is waiting for him in the room where women are talking of Michelangelo. Eventually he enters the room and remembers In three rhyming stanzas the times he has heard the same voices, seen the same people. He knows that society very well and he does not like it.
He finds it trivial and boring; he says: Then he starts to rehearse what he dares not to say, and he does not say it.
He never asks the question, his only excuse being that he is no prophet, that he does not have the strength of John the Baptist. After that mock-heroic tone and after that self-justification, Prufrock looks back upon the event and thinks about his failure. But his fear of being misunderstood makes him accept his failure. In the last part of the poem there is a great change: Prufrock at the end tries to escape from the real world where he was defeated and he dreams of mermaids.
Yet he cannot avoid the realty and he drowns. The poem is a song of desire and failure. It seems to be the story of what is taking place inside a man called Prufrock. Prufrock talks to himself. Is Prufrock trying to issue a marriage proposal? The answer may be different for different readers. But it seems to be irrelevant.
It is enough to know that Prufrock never asks the question; that he is unable to ask it. We should not look for a concealed narrative in the poem. Eliot is not presenting a story, but a personality. The poem is built around the timid person called Prufrock. This character needs to be analysed. After reading the poem we think of Prufrock as an unattractive middle-aged man who grows old and talks about his bald spot in his hair.
He is aware of his weakness and disabilities: He knows he is not Prince Hamlet and he does not think the mermaids will sing to him. He knows that he cannot make a decision. Therefore he takes refuge in self mockery. He is resigned to his failure. However, he is sensitive to criticism. He knows that people around him remark that his arms and legs are growing thin line 44 and have him sprawling on a pin line Alfred Prufrock is an unhappy frustrated man.
He is involved in a routine of social life and he does not feel comfortable in the society in which he is condemned to live. He sees boredom and monotony. Though he is conditioned by that fashionable society, he seems to be tired of the superficial and miserable existance he is leading. Besides, he is isolated in that alien world. He has a range of more or less obscure feelings that he cannot communicate due to his inhibitions and timidity.
He then talks to himself and he suffers. Prufrock is a mask, a person through whom the tribulations of the modern city life are spoken. One of the themes this poem develops is the tedium and dryness of modern life. It is an expression of the futility of life. The reader gets an intense personal view of the society, the city and the world in which Prufrock lives.
The poem also conveys a sense of frustration which leads us into the main issue: The speaker cannot get his message across. It does not matter whether the recipient of that message is a lady or not. The fact is that communication fails. However, mostly, Eliot set of objects, a chain of events, and a situation as the lone technique to prompt a feeling in the system of art while discovery of a neutral correlative which is the formulation of a particular emotion.
First, Eliot attains the extermination of his disposition by introducing the poetic method of a theatrical monologue. Most of these themes are associated with particular rhetoric devices used within the poem. It is stated that Eliot employs unique techniques and impressive devices filled with imagery, juxtaposition, metaphors and allusion to serve as a better understanding of the present themes.
The central theme in the poem is supported by thematic ideas of love, alienation, loneliness, pessimism as well as depressiveness. Therefore, some of the themes in the poem include;. The dented spirit of Humanity. Eliot as one of the modernist writers wanted to articulate the fragile mental state of civilization in the 20th century.
Modernist writers want to capture the transformed world which perceived as alienated, fractured and denigrated. The trauma and ideals of the 1st World War, preferably tested cultural concepts of manly identity resulting incapable poets to change the world in verse. For instance, Europe missed a whole cohort of young individuals basically to the dismays of Great War that caused an overall disaster of maleness whereby the fighters fought to get a place in an altered society.
Eliot explored many aspect of humanity as communally injured spirit that prohibited individuals from collaborating with each other in the poem. Love is another theme explored in the poem by Eliot. The title suggests this theme can be seen. This statement denies love its chance to bloom. The anxieties and obsessions about the world and the individual within the world has led the author of this poem from interacting and fundamentally condemned to a life of isolation. From the references depicted from the poem, Prufrock is making note of how he is bored with the society stating that the people all the world are the same.
It is evident that he has become so accustomed to his loneliness that even his internal channel of communication reflects it. The Influence of Literary Antiquity.
This theme is ideally exercised in the poem since Eliot maintained high veneration for fairytale along with Western mythical norm. The poem is packed with footnotes, allusions and quotations whereby Eliot acclaims the mythical tradition by stating that the finest writer is the one who pens with an intellect of steadiness. Evidently, the best work based on poetry improves the mythical practice.
Eliot suggests that the integration of literary past should be amalgamated into fashionable poetry. The poem as it was written guards against extreme academic acquaintance which is the most vital jiffs of the ancient conditions.
This concept juxtaposes various fragments of literary as well as traditions based on sounds and scenes from current life. Therefore, the theme of the power of literary history reinterprets historical context and canonical texts of culture and humankind in the poem. The varying design of the gender personnel. From the poem, the life of Eliot, sexuality and gender roles has become more increasingly flexible since he reflects the variations in his effort.
Women were confined to the domestic sphere in the Victorian period of the 19th century. Sexuality had no public exploration despite the fact that puritanical air verbalized most communal connections. The interactions ushered the new period of surplus and frankness. Substantially, the existence of World War I transformed society given the fact that people felt isolated from each another as well permitted to pause social refinement.
Education is a factor that women could not afford in the initial times of the 20th century. Modern writers created the notion of manliness and feminineness as optimum identities that are likely to be dedicated by societies. Eliot through his poem illustrated this theme and uttered apprehension about the freedom intrinsic in the current time of life. The poem ideally reflects the feeling of emasculation practiced by several men during the World War I. This is one of the most important themes in the poem.
The theme consistently is flipping between the past and the future adding the implication that the present is not worth noting.
Prufrock continually references the idea that he is getting old and the time is running out for him to become accomplished. The central worry for Prufrock is time since he reflects that time gives him the capability to change his decisions. Time is a very essential and constant factor. It ideally continues to tick regardless of our actions. In the poem, time is understood as a physical concept that is not infinite. Eventually time is finite and runs out. Therefore, the idea of time as the theme within the poem by Eliot suggests that Prufrock is wasting it.
Mythological and Spiritual ritual. The marvelous facts of Eliot based on religious ritual, myth and academic works in the mythical practice notifies every facet of his poesy. Eliot completed his poems by having an obscure of educating his readers while writing.
He further clarifies the critical part adopted by myths and religious symbols by slowly drawing from fertility rituals. Hindu chants are alternative spiritual possibilities that enabled a hurt figure getting cured by the detriment of a model. From the poem water is used to symbolizes both life and death.
Traditionally, the Fisher King brought death, famine and unhappiness. The characters in the poem wait for water to quench their thirst given the fact that water has the regenerative likelihood of reinstating life along with fertility.
Elsewhere water provides solace and brings relief. Eliot cautions people to beware of simple solutions for what looks harmless might turn out to be very hazardous.
Join Now Log in Home Literature Essays The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Essays Sterility and Communion in T.S. Eliot and Gerard Manley Hopkins Nathaniel Popper The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. Twenty some years after the death of Gerard Manley Hopkins, T.S. Eliot began where Hopkins had left off.
Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Essay: An Analysis Words | 4 Pages. An Analysis of The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock The general fragmentation of "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" is obvious.
The following entry presents criticism on Eliot's poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" (). See also The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Poetry Criticism, T. S. Eliot Criticism (Volume 1), and Volumes 2, 3, 6. "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" is considered one of Eliot's finest and most important works. “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” is in part a satire. Its character is not the hero of romance but an antihero, one constrained by fear. He spends much of the poem contemplating what to him is to be a daring act, but is in fact only the effort to talk to women at a social event.
- The Pitiful Prufrock of The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock T.S. Elliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," is a melancholy poem of one man's frustrated search to find the meaning of his existence. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is a psychological profile of a white, middle-aged, middle-class, late Victorian man suffering from an acute spiritual malaise as a result of his boring, unimaginative, routine, repressed bourgeois existence.